Thoughts on Corporate America
vs. Private Enterprise.
For some 50 years I owned and operated a
small to medium size commercial printing company, published a regional trade
journal for the printing industry, was a consultant to small and medium size
print shops, and was the international source of where to find products and
services and how to produce difficult jobs. In the mid 1990's I decided it was
time to retire, so I sold the shop. After 15 years I got tired of sitting home
and started looking for a part-time job. 2009 was not the best time to go job
hunting, but I was fortunate and got numerous offers - problem was
that most offers were all
full-time and all required me to move from Lufkin. That wasn't going to happen.
By chance, an opening came up at our local
Office Depot (OD) in their Print and Copy Center - a
perfect fit for me because they hire only part-time associates and I could stay
involved in the printing industry.
The managers and other associates are great
to work with. OD's policy of greeting customers is the best I have seen in any
business. I did not care about the money, so I immediately
accepted the near minimum-wage position. They are totally dedicated to
the customer. However there are some major differences - some I am still having
a problem of dealing with after working there for a year.
Having over 20 years experience as a highly
paid consultant to small and medium size print shops in the area of maximizing
profits and customer service, were our OD Print and Copy (P&C) center a
privately owned shop, it would be the epitome of a shop that was in deep trouble
and needed help. However, corporate shows our P&C the most profitable department
in the store. That took some research.
Turns out that corporate does not consider
the most expensive cost in a P&C - labor - as a cost. Their philosophy is that
the associate is there anyway - so that cost is not attributed to the individual
jobs.
Also, there is no one in the corporate chain
- from the P&C manager through the CEO of the company who apparently has any
experience in "manufacturing." No one understands there is a vast difference
between manufacturing and retail sales. All are experts in "marketing."
In the retail store, customers come in to
buy items that were manufactured by someone else, shipped to the store in bulk,
put on the shelves for associates in those departments to sell, and management
encourages those associates to upgrade the sale.
In the P&C, our customers look at us as a
destination point. They come specifically to have us "manufacture" something for
them. Whether it is a single photocopy, a typesetting job, a business card, or
one hundred copies of a 250-page cookbook, each job is unique (except in the
case where that customer has us repeat the job.)
Many customers are more observant than is local management or corporate in that they
recognize how inefficient our operation is.
Corporate and management looks at P&C like
any other department in the store. Our equipment must be lined up in the manner
that corporate has dictated - against a wall, closely placed side-by-side, with
no working area, and where the associate working on that piece of equipment has
his or her back to the customer counter.
There are no work tables, because "they do
not look attractive to the customer." The unintended consequences of this are
that we often must use a knife to trim a printed or laminated document. With no
work table, that trimming must be done on one of the customer counters and the
knife makes unattractive scores in the surface of the counter.
Some tools that are necessary to the
printer are frowned upon because they are "dangerous." Mat knives with no point
are useless to a printer. A bodkin or awl is a necessary pointed tool. A trimmer
that doesn't have some kind of protective device is banned and not replaced.
Rulers that the scale does not start at the end of the rule are difficult to use
(we need to use a pica pole). Equipment used in the manufacturing business may
be dangerous, but in my 50 years experience, any of the very few injuries I have
seen were caused by user error and not equipment failure. Associates have the
responsibility to use care when operating any of this equipment.
Our self-service printers are located
outside of the counters surrounding the P&C. We have a large display of various
colors and weights of paper which the customer may select from. Problem is that
our price on that stock ranges from $.02 per sheet to $.10 per sheet and we
never get paid for it. That display should be inside the P&C and the customer
needs to request however many sheets they require.
Most important is that corporate does not understand that it is never
appropriate to have the production area visible to the customer.
Our corporate provided job ticket is one of
the worst designed job tickets I have ever seen. It is 4-pages, incomplete,
missing SKUs, in no reasonable order, and full of unnecessary drivel. Everything
required could be easily compiled on one page with the back side compiling two
other order forms - eliminating two order forms.
Orders should be produced on a first-in,
first-out basis most of the time. While we have a place on the top of the job
ticket for the date and time a job came in, it is rarely filled in by the
associate who took it. Even if it were, when an associate is looking for the
next job to produce, he or she would have to look through all of the job tickets
on the job table to find the next one. A simple queue list with the customer's
name and brief description of the job to be filled out when the job ticket was
written up and when it was due out would take care of this situation in need of a solution.
We have a place for completed jobs, but
there is no organization. It is a few cubby holes under the customer counter.
Time is wasted looking through all of the cubby holes for the job. They need to
be organized alphabetically or have a job rack like most pharmacies have where
ready-to-pick-up items are in large plastic holders in alphabetical order.
Replacement of equipment that is at the end
of it's life should be immediate, rather than waiting months for replacement
approval. A case in point is that one of the most profitable
pieces of equipment was our punch and binding machine. The frame broke on that
and the technician said it had to be replaced. A competent manager would have
had the replacement shipped next day air, but after several months, corporate
has not authorized the purchase. The individual responsible for holding up that
replacement needs to be relieved of any decision making responsibility.
There needs to be a better method of
ordering necessary supplies and we need to constantly monitor supply inventory
to make certain we have back-up, and immediately order necessary supplies.
Often we run out of supplies before an order is placed.
There will never be a job come into the P&C
that we cannot handle. The problem is that only certain types of jobs are
authorized, our production facility does not have the capability
or authority to produce everything a customer
may require, and the individual P&C associates do not have the authority to
order these items or services from an area trade service.
We could substantially increase our profits if associates were able to outsource
some items that corporate cannot provide. Problem there is that rarely does OD
hire associates experienced in the printing industry and it would be a disaster
to allow inexperienced associates to outsource jobs at their digression.
OD needs to look
at FedEx/Kinko philosophy. There is a corporate manager of the Kinko division
who has vast experience in the management and operation of a small to medium
size P&C. OD needs such an individual who understands the
manufacturing process and whose sole responsibility is to assure the
efficient operation of all P&Cs. Such an individual could
vastly improve our profit picture.
Often experienced associates have personal software that would enable the
production of a job much more efficiently or in come cases simply produce the
job (such as OCR software) Even though a customer may authorize their job to be
produced office, it is OD's philosophy not to do so. If the associate agrees to
do so and if the customer has no problem with the job being produced off site,
this should be authorized. However to do so results in immediate termination.
Professional printers who happen to be associates want to do everything possible
to give the customer what he requires. Occasionally that associate (printer)
wants to come in and produce the job on his/her own time, off the clock, but
that is rarely authorized. Local management should have some flexibility in this
area. Management does not seem to realize that often the associate is more
interested in the job rather than the compensation.
Our local OD P&C is pretty much a clone of
my old shop except I had small offset capability, more appropriate bindery
equipment, and more appropriate software. I also was able to
easily outsource anything I did not have the capability of producing. My
volume was about the same as ours ($250M to $500M
per year) with a customer base of about 950+ small
customers and a half dozen or so larger customers. I had four full-time
employees paid between $10 and $18 per hour, two
part-time employees paid $10 and $24, myself full time
and my bride part-time. We consistently took home between $125,000 and $150,000
per year. or about $10,000 to $12,000 per month. Many of my
old customers cannot understand why I cannot produce their job the way I use to
do it.
Bottom line is that management is afraid to offend anyone up the chain and those
up the chain have no idea of how the manufacturing process works. The
inefficiency perpetuates itself. P&C managers were once P&C associates. They had
no experience in the printing environment so they had no idea how a shop should
be run. As they progress up the chain of command new associates do not have the
proper training. This is repeated over and over again. Associates become so
indoctrinated in operating inefficiently that they do not realize how
inefficient they are and do not complain up the chain of command. As long as
pencil pushers and marketers are given the "busy work" to come up with useless
forms, inefficient shop layout, and regulations that substantially curtail
profit, corporate will never know just how profitable their P&Cs could be.
This is the first time in my working
career, other than the time I was in the US Army, that I have had a "job." I've
always owned my company, so parts of this new job were a real shock. I spoke
with a number of friends and past associates who had worked in both the
corporate and private environment in various industries and they told me I hit
the nail on the head - "that's the way it is." Do it their way and don't worry
about it. That was excellent advice.
Now the good/bad
news. After about 15 months of putting up with the pleasure of working with old
customers, meeting new customers, playing around with the equipment, I was
terminated. Fired from my first job. How about that? One of my loyal old
customers came in with a job and she wanted it typeset using a typestyle I had
used some of her work years ago. We did not have that font, so she asked if I
could do it at home and she would pay me. I told her I would be happy to do it
at home, but OD would have to be paid for that work. A manager found out about
it, reported me to corporate HR, and HR asked that I be terminated. The upside
is that the $300 I made every two weeks was not really needed and can be easily
replaced; I can spend more time working on my home business which is far more
profitable; and I can still keep my finger in the printing business by accepting
typesetting and printing jobs that would have been unethical while working for
another print shop. The downside is that I will really miss visiting with the
customers since I do not have a walk-in shop.
The upside is that from my home office I have started doing a little printing
for my old customers. On the actual printing, using Office Depot's pricing, my
profits are greater than when I had my own shop. On the typesetting and artwork
I am substantially higher, but do a better job. I simply cannot spend over an
hour on a typesetting job and charge only $5.00